Saturday 30 March 2013

Current and future photographers how digital technology affects do you think?

Written By Unknown; About: Current and future photographers how digital technology affects do you think? on Saturday 30 March 2013

printersall-in-one.blogspot.com ® Current and future photographers how digital technology affects do you think?

Real question made by jcwiechert: How is digital technology affecting the photographers of today and beyond?

In the near future, how will phography manifest itself?

will “prints” on paper still going to be around?

what variations in photography style will the future hold?


Actually important facts about How is digital technology affecting the photographers of today and beyond? that you may would be smart to solve problems in their own business. With some luck , this assists in several ways; that will create the way you live considerably better. In hopes important facts about How is digital technology affecting the photographers of today and beyond? is likely to be an option sooner or later.

Most practical answer:


Answer by sachkehtahu

dIGITAL EDITING HAS CHANGED TEH MEANING OF PHOTOGRAPHIC ART TOO MUCH.

but still there are good photographer expensive than good editors.


non -proff. artists can benefit from various programs avail. free like photoshop,google picasa(free download here http://angle-mine.blogspot.com )

But the ultimate artist is our own ANGLE.


Answer by Carl P

Photography has become a computer skill more then a photgraphy art form.

ANyone with a good camera can re-work a picture and produce a faily nice to very nice image.

Prints will be around as the number of photo mags seems to have increased. ALso people like to hang their art on the wall.

The future will be a time of trying to tell what is a one shot picture or a compiled shot from a computer. Still making it easier has produced more “recordings” of the current age for the archieves.


I am still messing with tin type work.


Answer by beetlechickster

I don’t agree that photography has become a computer skill (However in saying that you need computer skills to manipulate it to become recognised within the industry). I think there are still genuine photographers around who take amazing photos which are unrecognised because people can tweak things too much with a computer and create ‘perfection’. They can make the sea bluer, they can make the leaves of the tree greener, but they cant capture the same spirit you get in a genuine photograph.


Print will always be around. People enjoy reading, Magazine numbers increase, and people like to adorn their homes with art.


Answer by Bob

1. It’s making them lazier. Why take time to setup a tripod and carefully compose when you’v got a machine gun.

2. Everyone will have a 23 megapixel camera phone and think it’s just peachy.

3. No, they will go the way of magazines, books, and newspapers. Oh yeah, they’re still here…

4. True artists will turn off their camera phones and shoot Holgas and think they’ve discovered something new.


Answer by wackywallwalker

The digital revoultion did not bring about photo manipulation, it just made it easier. Remember that photo manipulation is something which is not new to the photographic field and has been around since the advent of the daguerreotype process in 1839. Even when we speak of pure photography citing such groups as the f64, and their unofficial leader Ansel Adams who is synonymous with straight photography, even these people manipulated their images quite a bit in the darkroom. If you are familiar with the zone system of photography, a method of previsualization used by supposedly straight photographers, it is a system which promotes manipulation.

So how is the digital revolution affecting photography these days? We always seem to assume that if you give someone an improved tool their job will be easier, but in fact that is the exact opposite. With an improved tool we become more productive, and more is expected of us. What more is expected of us? With the digital revolution there is a lot more post production work i.e, Photoshop work. In the past we would just send the roll or sheet film to a professional film developer and at most perhaps we might ask them to push or pull the film, and that was that. Also deadlines are tighter because they know that with digital it is easier to produce more. Unfortunately more doesnt always equate to quality and often times this results in having to work in photoshop more.

As for prints, or silver process photography still being around in the coming years. I am sure it will. Back in 1839 it was believed that photography would take over the job of the painter, but look where we are today, still lots of painters. Also there are lots of people these days practicing photographic techniques that haven’t been in popular use for 150 years just go to this website if you don’t believe me http://www.alternativephotography.com/process.html

What variations in photographic styles will the future hold? In this case, I don’t see anything changing. In terms of the job they do, capturing still images, digital cameras and film cameras really aren’t all that different. Although the biggest difference is the amount of discrete information in terms of meta-data which a digital image can hold. What makes digital images unique is all that hidden data about how the image was shot etc..which makes the digital image more interesting. In this way perhaps the imbedded meta-data is where we will see the biggest improvements in digital imaging. Imagine all the things we could be imbedding in images, what if cameras had a GPS emedded device which could imprint each photo with a unique geographic location. there is no limit to our imaginations.


Answer by Beauxpatrick

Wait a few more years and we will be able to get terabyte storage space from a camera chip to a Hard Drive. We will have megapixils no longer rated in MB.


We will have “NASA” quality on the market…


That means that everything we create today will be obsolete…

It will affect old and new users alike…


A very interesting Q!


beaux


PS: could be like holding a miniature “Hubble Telescope” in your hand…. for about $ 1000.00 US.


Acknowledge far better?

Add your very own answer in their comments!


Its proponents say it’s the next disruptive technology with the potential to significantly change the landscape of a number of industries. Peter Marsh, manuf…


print giveaway! (CLOSED)


Reputation by simply print giveaway! (CLOSED)


i know I’m not the most popular photographer, but I had the idea to do a print giveaway in honor of the new year. So starting on the 1st of January, 2011, comment or message me with the picture you’d like. I will pick 5 winners. I hope this works. I’m looking to start selling prints in the new year, too!


Spread the news!


Current and future photographers how digital technology affects do you think?